AI-assisted internal-audit fieldwork
P2P fieldwork that a reviewer can follow.
Recreating procedures and tracing spreadsheet exceptions each quarter makes review harder. Start with one explicit Test Recipe and the evidence it requires.
Book a demoIllustrations explain the product model. Confirm your procedure, formats and review requirements during evaluation.
Start with supplied evidence.
Invoice population, invoice PDFs, approved purchase orders, goods receipts, ERP payment export, vendor master, authority matrix and procurement policy.
An explicit procedure and a concrete exception.
The illustrative amount check compares ₹1,25,000 with an approved ₹1,20,000 PO. Its ₹5,000 difference exceeds a ₹1 tolerance. Goods receipt and payment are separate procedures; this check alone does not establish them.
DEMO-RUN-018 has 180 of 190 eligible records completed, with 6 awaiting evidence and 4 processing errors. These are single-check marketing counts, not current product results.
P2P — Q1 FY27 · DEMO-0042
P2P amount check
Amount mismatch · Awaiting reviewer confirmation
DEMO-0042.pdf · Page 1 · subtotal region
- Role / version
- Primary evidence · v1
- Original → normalised
- 1,25,000.00 → ₹1,25,000
- Method / corrections
- Illustrative extraction · None in illustration
purchase-orders.xlsx · Orders!H43
- Role / version
- Source of truth · v1
- Original → normalised
- 120000 → ₹1,20,000
- Method / corrections
- Illustrative cell read · None in illustration
Synthetic Procurement Policy v3 §4.2Compare invoice subtotal with approved PO amount. Absolute difference must not exceed ₹1. If the approved PO is unavailable, report Insufficient evidence.
Effective 2026-04-01 · Recipe v3
Invented source excerpts; no original files are downloadable. Confidence and exact page regions need evaluation against actual evidence.
Illustrative Run snapshot · DEMO-RUN-018
180 of 190 eligible records completed.
One check per record · Q1 FY27. Completion does not resolve human review.
- Received
- 200
- Eligible
- 190
- Execution completed
- 180
- Excluded
- 10
- Awaiting evidence
- 6
- Processing failures
- 4
- Pass157
- Fail17
- Insufficient evidence6
- Needs human review6
- Not applicable0
- Processing error4
Outcomes total 190 eligible records; excluded records are separate. Missing evidence is reported separately unless the configured completeness procedure explicitly defines its absence as a failure.
Recipe v3 · Inputs v1 · illustrative engine demo-1 / model fixture-1. Completed Run history is immutable. A new Recipe version creates new work; it does not rewrite this snapshot.
Draft / review incomplete · Finding: Not raised · 0 confirmed exceptions.
Carry the source into review.
The expected output is a record-level exception with expected/actual values, rule/version citation and source Trace. All illustrated results await reviewer confirmation; working-paper status is Draft / review incomplete. Confirmed related exceptions can support a finding after human review.
Reuse the procedure. Review the new period.
Clone the approved template into the engagement, set the entity and period, and review the population, authoritative sources and tolerance. A new period uses its own input versions and Run; it does not overwrite the previous review.
Alongside amount matching, evaluate separate approval-limit, duplicate-invoice and recalculation procedures. Invoice, PO, GRN and ERP payment records answer different questions. The worked subtotal result alone does not establish receipt, payment or every control.
Keep the scope clear.
Internal audit independently retests controls. Existing planning and reporting systems can remain in place; no certified integration is asserted.
Missing evidence is reported separately unless the configured completeness procedure explicitly defines its absence as a failure.
Is this a current product Run?
No. It is a labelled synthetic illustration, informed by the product model. Current release capture and export acceptance remain outstanding.
Your next procedure
Start with the work you need to review.
Discuss the sources, rules and output your team needs. Please keep confidential audit evidence out of the enquiry form.