AI-assisted internal-audit fieldwork
Keep the procedure with the evidence.
A working paper documents the work performed and the limits of its conclusion. The illustrative P2P Run remains Draft / review incomplete.
Book a demoIllustrations explain the product model. Confirm your procedure, formats and review requirements during evaluation.
DEMO-RUN-018 · Q1 FY27
Working paper / P2P amount check
Draft / review incomplete · Awaiting reviewer confirmation
Scope and coverage
Invoice subtotal comparison for Q1 FY27. 200 received, 190 eligible, 180 completed, 10 excluded, 6 awaiting evidence and 4 processing failures.
Procedure and criteria
Recipe v3, inputs v1. Invoice subtotal against approved PO; ₹1 tolerance. Synthetic Procurement Policy v3 §4.2.
Exception register
DEMO-0042: expected ₹1,20,000; actual ₹1,25,000; difference ₹5,000. Amount mismatch. Reviewer confirmation is outstanding.
Evidence index
DEMO-0042.pdf, page 1, subtotal region; purchase-orders.xlsx, Orders!H43. Original and normalised values are retained in the illustrated source explanation.
Comments, findings and sign-offs
No confirmed exceptions, finding, override reason or conclusion approval is recorded. Preparation and review must be completed before locking; later changes create a new version.
Illustrative Run snapshot · DEMO-RUN-018
180 of 190 eligible records completed.
One check per record · Q1 FY27. Completion does not resolve human review.
- Received
- 200
- Eligible
- 190
- Execution completed
- 180
- Excluded
- 10
- Awaiting evidence
- 6
- Processing failures
- 4
- Pass157
- Fail17
- Insufficient evidence6
- Needs human review6
- Not applicable0
- Processing error4
Outcomes total 190 eligible records; excluded records are separate. Missing evidence is reported separately unless the configured completeness procedure explicitly defines its absence as a failure.
Recipe v3 · Inputs v1 · illustrative engine demo-1 / model fixture-1. Completed Run history is immutable. A new Recipe version creates new work; it does not rewrite this snapshot.
Draft / review incomplete · Finding: Not raised · 0 confirmed exceptions.
A reviewable record of the work.
Include objective, risk, entity, period, population, coverage, exclusions and limitations; input roles and versions; procedure, extracted fields, matching logic, calculations and tolerances.
Retain company policy and regulatory citations, Recipe/Run versions, all six result states, typed exceptions, findings, comments, overrides and their reasons, evidence index, sign-offs and execution/approval dates.
Sources must remain usable.
An exception register needs the compared values, typed verdict, review decision and source references. A page or cell citation is distinct from a public download link. Access-controlled product links may require an authenticated session.
P2P — Q1 FY27 · DEMO-0042
P2P amount check
Amount mismatch · Awaiting reviewer confirmation
DEMO-0042.pdf · Page 1 · subtotal region
- Role / version
- Primary evidence · v1
- Original → normalised
- 1,25,000.00 → ₹1,25,000
- Method / corrections
- Illustrative extraction · None in illustration
purchase-orders.xlsx · Orders!H43
- Role / version
- Source of truth · v1
- Original → normalised
- 120000 → ₹1,20,000
- Method / corrections
- Illustrative cell read · None in illustration
Synthetic Procurement Policy v3 §4.2Compare invoice subtotal with approved PO amount. Absolute difference must not exceed ₹1. If the approved PO is unavailable, report Insufficient evidence.
Effective 2026-04-01 · Recipe v3
Invented source excerpts; no original files are downloadable. Confidence and exact page regions need evaluation against actual evidence.
Confirm the output you need.
Discuss the Excel, Word, PDF or CSV output your reviewer needs, including source references and comments. PDF delivery and compatibility with your own template need confirmation in the evaluation.
No genuine sample is published here yet. Named GRC integrations require separate validation. Request a demonstration of the required format and its evidence links.
Draft, approval and later versions.
The product model requires human preparation and review before locking a paper. Later changes create a new version. An unresolved Run must not be described as a locked, approved paper.
Does this example confirm current availability?
The example explains the product model with synthetic data. Confirm the procedure, formats and review behaviour you need in an evaluation; a labelled illustration does not replace product evidence.
Your next procedure
Start with the work you need to review.
Discuss the sources, rules and output your team needs. Please keep confidential audit evidence out of the enquiry form.